DNA — A Tangible Imprint

The Result of Parental Source Fragmentation

Dealing with Imprints

The DNA molecule can be accurately described as the physical embodiment of a generalized mental and/or Will imprint, and, as such, representative of the averaged, combined awareness and/or intent of the parental entities co-sponsoring the formation of the target DNA structure. Thus, the DNA molecule could be considered to be a tangible measure of the imprinted awareness, intent and generalized intelligence of its energetic parental source, which may or may not bear any resemblance to the animating entity that eventually inhabits the physical structure (or organic body) that is to be created and maintained by a specific DNA molecular type imprint. Hmmmmm. What does this mouthful of words imply? Leaving out some of the awareness jargon, it means that, at least for this article, two physical entities (the parental source) come together and create some sort of physical body imprint that then is allowed to mature into some form of externalized body, and that is sooner or later inhabited by an animating force that may or may not be a direct fragment of either parental source supplying the originating physical imprint. Or, in other words, in the case of a human example, two people get together and copulate and some nine months later a baby pops out into the physical world, and that baby body is inhabited and animated by a personality that often, but not necessarily, is a fragment or combination of fragments of the copulating parents. In my case, however, my parents were long ago fragments of me and I also represented denials that they made a long time ago, too.

For most animate beings this so-called “DNA imprint” is effectively an immutable force governing the overall structure and vitality of the physical aspect of the child organism. But that it might seem to be unalterable in virtually every case does not, of itself, constitute proof of immutability, only that the majority of beings inhabiting a body do not possess the awareness to know and/or understand how the governing imprint can be modified, transformed and/or resolved. This inability to understand, modify or resolve an imprint should come as no surprise, because an imprint is essentially the rigidified result of a parental action, with the imprint being passed on to a child fragment. However, normally only the imprinted essence is passed on, not the choices or creative processes that led up to a parental source rigidifying a bit of their mental and/or Will essence.

The concept behind imprinting is crucial here, and so exactly what is an imprint? If one considers only the mental aspect, anything that is sooner or later to be regarded as an imprint is essentially the end result of some judgmental action, i.e., the imposition and rigidification of a choice or decision. Thus, any choice, decision or attitude that is permanently rigidified can become, by definition, an imprint once it is passed on to another being, usually into a fragmented out child entity. Put another way, it is a judgment or attitude within the mentality that is made permanent, or rigidified, and that is then passed on to some other entity through the process of fragmentation, but also transferred without any knowledge of how that judgmental decision was decided or reached in the first place. Consequently, only the parental source retains the ability to truly understand and resolve the judgmental imprint, which passes on only the end result, not the process or the reasoning behind it. This leaves the child entity without any clear ability to understand the reasoning or intent behind the originating judgment. This makes an imprint a rigidified choice but without any of the energetic connecting components or logic that might allow understanding, modification and/or resolution. This usually means that the child entity is utterly helpless to some degree without the greater and initiating knowledge of the parental source.

This ought to make it clear that the continued fragmentation of any parental source has serious long term ramifications, with each successive child becoming a parental source for yet a more fragmented and essence diminished child, each generation becoming less complete and more imprinted and rigidified than those preceding them. That this kind of ongoing process will eventually lead to some sort of de-evolutionary disaster should not be difficult to discern. A vicious cycle quickly develops whereby each successive generation becomes less and less capable of recognizing its own diminishment and failing vitality. Moreover, this kind of age-old process is very evident on earth today, with symptoms suggesting an advanced or possibly even a semi-terminal stage of fragmentation. The upshot here is this: Once created and implanted in child or other entities these mental imprints are just as unalterable to the average person as are the eventually resulting physical counterpart DNA imprints. However, all imprints can be adjusted, transformed and/or completely resolved and released, but only IF the associated mentality has the knowledge and wherewithal to communicate with and deal with the initiating judgmental forces holding the imprint fast and seemingly immutable.

Unfortunately, from my experience, very few individuals seem to posses or desire any useful knowledge or knowing of how to deal with and resolve judgments, let alone imprints, whether they be mental or of the Will aspect and its personalized body. But even with the apparent immutability of imprints, especially the densified examples like DNA molecules, there are still, nonetheless, numerous easy to observe examples of spontaneous but gradual imprint alteration within individuals. But how and why? Within any life experience, sooner or later, some sort of unanticipated crisis experience will interrupt the normalcy of an individual’s life by triggering up mentality and feelings that would normally not be allowed, and in this process it is sometimes the case that basic imprinting gets “automatically” modified, or perhaps even partially resolved. While this “accidental” methodology can work to an individual’s benefit, it is a haphazard process and therefore not an optimal way to change an individual’s imprinting.

So, then, presuming that someone can actually isolate and indentify an imprint, just how does that person go about changing or resolving it when the intelligence, choices and initiating process were never part of that individual’s life experience? This vexing question begs the next: How does someone recover parental intelligence and knowledge that is and was never theirs to recover, so that they can effectively and permanently heal an imprint? To many this may seem to be an impossible situation, a paradox with no viable solution. However, there is a solution, or more correctly a myriad of solutions, although they generally tend to fall within the scope of one of several techniques. The variations here are probably limitless and far beyond the scope of this little article, but here are a few techniques (presented in the order of difficulty and that can be used in any combination) that can lead to success:

Sound easy? Don’t be fooled. Many people have jumped into this awareness work hoping for the best, but finding out first-hand how difficult recovery can be. It is not that it is inherently difficult, but most people are quite unwilling to let go of cherished judgments and judgmental belief systems and the inhibitions that go along with them, a choice that will forever halt any forward progress. Nevertheless, it is possible for the determined hero to succeed. For anyone successful at this awareness work dealing with mental judgments tends to be one of the first things that must be learned and put to effective use. However, dealing with what are essentially physical imprints brings into play a lot of other knowledge that must also be at one’s fingertips. This requires knowing both the mental and the Will aspect and how to invite, work with and communicate with physical structures made manifest by the Will. Accomplishing these goals is the crux of this awareness work, although it may seem to be an impossible task for the uninitiated person who enjoys the status quo.

Terry Hathaway
July 29, 2008